Chinese Gymnasts |
This article from Time Magazine is a few years old, but quite interesting on the use of science to determine a gymnasts age. It seems to be coming a larger and larger debate as time goes on as to just how old some of the olympic gymnasts are and if there should be an age restriction. Currently The International Federation of Gymnastics (FIG) has set age restrictions at 16. Many of the Chinese gymnasts in particular were in question of the age restrictions, looking at the picture I can see why they do appear very young.
While sports science is becoming more advanced and can test for illegal substances, test for illnesses and even determine your gender, there is no way to determine an exact age. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has been under a lot of pressure to address "age doping". This lack in scientific ability seems to be a rising issue and olympic and other elite gymnasts appear to be getting younger and younger and ignoring the age restrictions.
There are some methods available to scientifically determine ages, however these tests are only accurate with a year or two. One interesting method was the use of dental records. Through the examination of the records it can be determined how long a person has been living since how worn the teeth are directly relates to age. However this also has a certainty of two years. This amount of uncertainty is too large when the ages in question are only about 14-16 years old. The article also said that "Most of these are also based on forensic approaches and have not been used to screen for age in living people."
Another approach scientists have began taking is examining is bones. One experimental method is MRI's of wrist bones which show to what extent the bones have fused. Bones fuse with age, so in theory the older the athlete the more fused the bones would be. This has one major downfall though, bones don't fuse the same way in females, so this test is only applicable to males. There are other bones in the body too which can lend some insight to age, however still none that would be able to pinpoint an age as either 14 or 16. The best way for scientists seems to be a combination of examining bones and dental wear. The use of these methods is not in use by FIG however, and it is unlikely they will be with the amount of uncertainty involved.
The girl in this video is only 6!!! She's obviously talented and training pretty hard even though she's nowhere near the age of being able to compete in the olympics or other international competitions. Granted this doesn't keep her out of local and state competitions.
This picture is from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7507461.stm They had another interesting article about the age of gymnasts. |
There's no scientific reasoning for the age restrictions or even to determine an exact age. I personally wonder if there should be an age restriction. These athletes at these levels are going to train just as hard whether they can compete at 14 or not, otherwise they wont have what it takes when they are 16. However at the same time I wonder without it where the line would be drawn and if there would be parents and coaches pushing 10 year old girls too far and forever destroying their bodies. At the same time though its an interesting paradox because most gymnasts begin as toddlers just playing around in the gym.
5 comments:
I feel like this is a little backwards because usually you hear about a kid on a little league team that is too old because his mom fudged his birth certificate. However, I don't really see a problem with setting an age minimum as I would assume the younger kids could have an advantage being smaller and not having the aches and pains of an older 16 year old.
I hadn't really thought of it that way. It definitely seems to be the one sport where parents don't complain about the kids being too old.
There is a major advantage to being small and not as easily breakable, however I know when I was 14 I didn't have the strength or they body awareness that it takes to be good at the sport, and a lot of athletes don't. I think it all kind of evens out and if they have that kind of ability they aren't really protecting the kids.
I'm with you on this, Bre. I really worry about girls who are too young taking on a sport as demanding as competitive gymnastics. I think their bodies aren't fully formed yet and they could do a lot of damage. You might check out the book Girls on the Edge (maybe there's a website for it?)--the authors of that book talks a lot about this. Fascinating subject.
I am a pretty tall guy, and I weigh a lot more than I used to. When I was younger, I was pretty active in skateboarding. I had no problem riding off of high ledges, landing, and rolling out of it. I tried revisiting the sport, only to find that when I rolled off the ledge and landed, I snapped the tail off my board. It made me pretty depressed, knowing that I will always be limited in the things I do because of my size. My point is that youth does make a difference.
With March Madness coming up, I was trying to find articles on NBA rules about age. I think its awful that people are putting themselves (or maybe the parents are pushing their kids...) through rigorous training at too young of an age. I know that everyone peaks at a certain age and it's best to compete before that time- athleticism doesn't last forever. With that being said, many of these athletes damage their bodies at such a young age! I would be forever regretful if I couldn't play with my kid (in the future) because I was silly and pushed myself too hard when I was a adolescent/young adult.
Post a Comment